Relevance to Conference Themes
The work must align with the conference scope and address relevant problems, developments or applications.
Authors are invited to submit original and unpublished research papers aligned with the scope of SESEEST 2027.
Manuscripts must present original work and should not be published or under review elsewhere. Authors must ensure that their papers comply with the prescribed conference template, ethical requirements and submission policies.
A maximum of five authors is permitted for one paper.
Similarity must not exceed 15%, excluding the bibliography.
Authors’ and reviewers’ identities will remain concealed.
Only PDF manuscripts will be accepted during initial review.
Authors must follow the requirements below before submitting their manuscripts.
The manuscript must fall within the conference scope or closely related technical areas. The Technical Program Committee has the right to determine whether a submission is within scope.
Manuscripts submitted simultaneously to another conference or journal will not be encouraged. The decision of the Technical Program Committee will be final in such cases.
Papers must be written in English and prepared using the prescribed conference manuscript template.
Papers with a similarity score of not more than 15%, excluding the bibliography, will be considered for review.
After acceptance, authors are responsible for submitting the final camera-ready paper and completing the copyright process through the link provided by the conference.
At least one author of every accepted paper must complete full registration and present the paper at the conference.
Accepted and presented papers will be considered for submission to the conference proceedings, subject to quality checks, editorial assessment and final publisher approval.
The Microsoft CMT service is used for managing the peer-review process for this conference. This service is provided free of charge by Microsoft, which bears the associated expenses, including Azure cloud services, software development and support.
Agreement acceptedSubmitted papers are evaluated through a structured, double-blind peer-review process.
Every manuscript is checked for scope, format, completeness and similarity before being assigned for review.
The identities of authors and reviewers are concealed throughout the review process.
Each eligible manuscript is reviewed by a minimum of three subject experts from national and international institutions.
Decisions are based on reviewer recommendations, technical quality, relevance, originality, significance and clarity.
A maximum of five papers will be assigned to an individual reviewer to support careful and timely evaluation.
Reviewers will assess submitted manuscripts using the following criteria.
The work must align with the conference scope and address relevant problems, developments or applications.
The manuscript must present original ideas, methods, systems, frameworks or applications.
The proposed work should demonstrate technical depth and make a meaningful contribution beyond existing studies.
The research methodology must be appropriate, clearly described and supported by adequate validation.
The paper should be logically organized, clearly written and understandable to the conference readership.
Research involving AI, healthcare, privacy or sensitive data must appropriately address ethical requirements.
The paper should review relevant literature, identify the research gap and position the proposed contribution clearly.
Results should be supported by appropriate tables, graphs, figures or other evidence and accompanied by critical analysis.
The manuscript must follow the required template, page limits, formatting requirements and submission deadline.
Reviewers will consider the ethical integrity and transparency of each submission.
The manuscript must be original, free from plagiarism and supported by accurate citations.
Data collection, use and sharing must be transparent, and potential conflicts of interest must be disclosed.
Data, experiments and methods must be accurate, reliable and free from inappropriate manipulation.
Appropriate credit must be given to contributors, institutions and funding organizations.
Financial and non-financial conflicts of interest and all funding sources must be declared.
Authors must follow all conference policies and respond appropriately to any substantial ethical concern.
Reviewer comments will normally be organized into three categories:
Review all submission requirements carefully before uploading the manuscript through Microsoft CMT.